Is democracy in Nigeria a myth or reality? This question has gained renewed significance in recent times, considering the actions of some of those entrusted with safeguarding our democratic values. Unfortunately, many in positions of authority appear to have strayed from the standards of decorum expected of leaders, often demonstrating a limited understanding of genuine democratic practice. It is concerning that some seem unwilling to improve or embrace these ideals, despite the great responsibility their offices demand.
Just last week, former President, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo lamented that the country is heading in the wrong direction and needs to be rescued. He is not alone. The Patriots, under Chief Emeka Anyaoku, after a three-day national summit, called for a new constitution to replace the current one, which they believe is no longer serving the interest of Nigerians. Why are these calls growing louder? Because many leaders in high office no longer speak or act in ways that reflect the will and aspirations of the people. Instead, they take the law into their own hands. A recent example is the unfortunate statement from Governor Monday Okpebholo of Edo State, who declared Peter Obi – a fellow Nigerian, former presidential candidate, and two-term governor of Anambra State – persona non grata in Edo.
He went further to threaten that Obi’s safety was not guaranteed if he dared to enter Edo without his permission. This is deeply troubling, particularly coming from a former lawmaker who should know that freedom of movement is a constitutional right of every Nigerian. The 1999 Constitution (as amended) guarantees under Section 41(1) that “every citizen of Nigeria is entitled to move freely throughout Nigeria and to reside in any part thereof.”
This right is not subject to the whims of state governors. One must then ask: Does Governor Okpebholo plan to seek permission from other governors before travelling to their states after his tenure? Should over 200 million Nigerians now require clearance to move from state to state within their own country? When did governors become gatekeepers of citizens’ movement in a democratic federation? While there may have been political undertones to Peter Obi’s visit, the governor’s choice of words betrayed him, regardless of intention. Many Nigerians viewed his outburst as an unnecessary threat to a fellow citizen who had committed no offence against him or Edo State.
Nigeria’s political class must realise that today’s society is not the same as yesterday’s. Citizens are more politically conscious than ever, shaped by their daily realities and experiences. The backlash within Edo State itself against the governor’s statement shows that Nigerians are no longer to be led blindly by intimidation and harassment. It is tragic if the federal government turns a blind eye while politicians desecrate democracy in the name of party loyalty. Such disturbing developments must be stopped to avoid further heating the polity.
Nigeria is a multi-party democracy under the law. Opposition parties have the right to exist, mobilise, and express themselves without fear or intimidation. Where this is denied, democracy becomes a mere myth rather than reality. Threatening the former Labour Party presidential candidate or any other political opponent only increases their popularity among the people. The ruling party and all stakeholders must understand that democracy thrives when people are allowed to make their own choices freely, without coercion.
Issuing threats, as seen in Edo State, does not only attract public outrage but also erodes whatever democratic gains the country has made since 1999. The political class must revisit the Constitution they swore to uphold. Those who do not know its provisions still have the opportunity to learn. We urge Nigeria’s leaders to be guided by the sensibilities of these times.
They must adhere strictly to democratic principles and ensure that no citizen is harassed or intimidated within their own land in the name of party politics. Ultimately, it is the people who decide who leads them, not the other way around. Anything to the contrary is undemocratic and must never be allowed.
